In cases that always resonate around the world, Argentine Supreme Court The parents of the sick children ruled that they were allowed to grow their own cannabis to treat their children. They determined that this decision was in line with existing Argentine law, the non-criminalization of cannabis for medical purposes.
As family law and cannabis legalization intersect, this development is about as important as the similar 2014 Israeli case. That is, families of sick children in need of medical cannabis threatened to move to Colorado unless they were entitled to medical cannabis in the country. The government changed the law within a few weeks.
That said, it wasn’t a complete victory for those who filed proceedings in Argentina last week. The court also unanimously ruled that the special patient registration currently in effect is not unconstitutional. This was an issue raised by Mamás Cannabis Medicinal (Macame) who presented the plaintiff’s cause. The court ruled that the state has the right to control and track all cannabis cultivation, including for medical purposes.
Of course, the decision in Argentina is important domestically. Still, timing becomes very important as countries begin to implement one after another, or at least as more general discussions about their own implementation. In this ruling, Argentine courts appear to follow global trends emerging in different countries, from Latin America and Europe (so far Malta, Italy, Luxemburg, Portugal) to Asia (especially Thailand). is.Home growth is great for both recreational and medical uses Ala mode The international normalization debate is now clearly underway, both legally and politically.
Why is Home Growth the first step towards a global default for reform?
There are several reasons why something that looks like a consensus at the international level emerges this fairly suddenly on issues related to self-cultivation. That is, the government is clearly receiving a message when faced with both the crisis in the healthcare delivery system as a result of both global austerity and the ensuing global outbreak, and the inevitability of recreational reform.
In other words, it is becoming increasingly clear that homegrown is not an incendiary way to undermine the legal market (either medical or recreational). In fact, homegrown cannabis is a very wise path to a normalized market when tracked (by registration and / or permission). See Canada. Of course, the system is not perfect.
In general, and most certainly, in countries at risk of recreational reform, such as Germany today (for example), patients are most affected by delays in full legalization of all kinds. Nearly 200,000 criminal cases are pending in German courts alone for low-level ownership, cultivation, and / or use. This is a huge waste of time and money that the state can easily save. actually, Case law is once again beginning to trend in this direction, Appeal just for now. However, courts are increasingly admitting that insurance companies are forcing legitimate patients to take legal action to obtain coverage. In the meantime, they have to take risks along the way and procure themselves.
This can change the overall role of home growth aus Deutschland Here, as it is elsewhere, at this point it is more likely by law than the legal action that has just taken place in Argentina.
Prosecuting a sick person is not a win everywhere so far. In fact, making it easier for people with chronic illnesses to treat themselves more or less when the healthcare system is tense to catch up with “regular” care sounds wise no matter how you look at it. increase. Or where. See Ukraine for an extreme example. But beyond this, all western states struggle to provide chronic care, including conditions that are usually treated with cannabis.
Of course, in addition to such a reality, such legal and political decisions are about how the rules are enforced even if the state is not the law itself, and issues and themes that are not limited to cannabis reform. It’s coming when you’re forced to consider.
Homeglow stimulates legal market
The Canadian model shows that it is absolutely “competitive” for the industry in that patients do not have to rely on commoditized and purchased products, but there is another way to see it all. Indeed, it is also true that the growth of a patient’s home is a way to stimulate a legally regulated market. Not to mention the broader economy that goes beyond the economy that benefits from the money diverted from the purchase of medicines.
Cannabis cultivation is not easy and requires energy. Entertainment enthusiasts are always present, but most people, including patients, want to be able to buy all forms of cannabis in the way they buy food, medicines, and other legitimate products.
This will generate employment, income and taxes.
Of course, the secret is to find a midpoint that allows both sides to prosper.
Just as legalization itself is inevitable, so is the right of people to grow their own cannabis for any purpose.
After all, it’s a “just” plant, beyond all demonization and stigma.