By The Minnesota Senate narrowly passed a bill last week on a 34-32 vote to speed up the licensing of cannabis businesses. If the bill passes Congress and is signed into law, it would set the stage for growers to begin growing regulated weeds by the end of the year.
The Minnesota Legislature passed a bill to legalize recreational marijuana in May 2023, allowing adults to possess up to 2 ounces of marijuana in public and 2 pounds at home starting August 1 of last year. was included. The measure would also allow adults to grow up to eight cannabis plants at home, including four mature flowering plants.
The bill would also legalize the cultivation and sale of regulated cannabis by licensed operators, with recreational cannabis dispensary sales expected to begin in January 2025. law If passed by the Minnesota Senate on Friday, state regulators would be able to give preliminary approval to cannabis growers starting this summer. Supporters of the bill say the bill would allow future regulated cultivators to finance their operations, secure a business location, and complete other tasks related to starting a business. It has said.
“This newly regulated, legalized and regulated industry is in its infancy, and we are here to continue the work we started last year,” Democratic Sen. Lindsey Port said. According to reports from albert lee tribune. “Like any new industry, it will never fully grow from day one. This bill will work to ensure a successful market launch and support the growth and development of the industry and the Minnesotans involved. To do.”
The bill also tasks the Minnesota Cannabis Control Authority with regulating cannabis-derived cannabinoids and medical marijuana, which are currently regulated by the state Department of Health. The Office recommended a number of provisions in the bill to facilitate a timely transition to regulated sales of recreational cannabis. The bill would allow businesses that receive early approval to grow adult-use cannabis to temporarily comply with the state’s existing rules for growing medical cannabis until the Bureau of Cannabis Control finalizes regulations for recreational cannabis later this year. will be applied.
Republican lawmakers oppose the bill
Many Republicans opposed the bill, expressing concern that creating temporary regulations that could differ from future permanent rules could be problematic. They also balked at allowing businesses to begin growing recreational weed before state approval.
“We understand that there are people who want to reopen the cannabis industry starting today,” Republican Sen. Jordan Rasmusson said. “But for the health and safety of Minnesotans, for public safety, for the integrity of our regulations, and for an open and transparent process where Minnesotans can participate in making the rules, I think it’s very important that we don’t let it end. .”
Opponents of the bill worry that accelerating the pace of approvals for regulated cultivators could have unintended consequences. They also proposed an amendment that would make marijuana possession by a minor a misdemeanor, out of concern about youth access to marijuana.
“It’s okay for a kid to be drinking beer and walking down the street with a bag of marijuana or smoking a joint, but it’s wrong for a kid to be drinking beer. “How can you say it’s a misdemeanor, maybe even a repeat offense,” said Sen. Eric Pratt. “Where is the consistency?”
Democratic Gov. Tim Walz said he is watching the bill’s development closely and understands some people are concerned about the prospect of being able to start growing by the end of the year, adding that the regulations include Cultivators stressed the need to include quality standards for cannabis.
“Certainly, I’m hearing people’s opinions on this. I think there’s some potential there,” Walz told reporters earlier this week. “We’re doing our best, but we’re not cutting corners.”
The bill was approved with amendments by the Minnesota House of Representatives last month. The bill will now be sent to a conference committee, where members of both chambers will reconcile differences between the two versions of the revised bill.
